Opinion
September 24, 1998
Respondent's findings that petitioner was absent without leave for her scheduled tour of duty, failed to perform her assigned duties despite several directives, engaged in a verbal altercation and was discourteous to a superior officer are supported by substantial evidence, including the testimony of a fellow officer and portions of petitioner's own testimony. The penalty of probationary dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness, particularly in light of petitioner's less than exemplary service record ( see, Matter of Pagan v. Brown, 176 A.D.2d 690, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 754; see also, Matter of Greaeny v. Bahou, 57 A.D.2d 646).
Contrary to petitioner's contention, her termination within the probationary period was validly premised upon misconduct predating the commencement of the probationary period (see, Matter of Prestia v. Brown, 191 A.D.2d 224). Moreover, petitioner's termination was additionally justified by an incident during the probationary period in which petitioner was late in relieving another officer of her post ( see, Matter of Butler v. Abate, 204 A.D.2d 171; Matter of Soto v. Koehler, 171 A.D.2d 567, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 855). We note, finally, that there is no credible evidence to support petitioner's allegations that her termination was effectuated in bad faith ( see, Matter of Johnson v. Katz, 68 N.Y.2d 649, 650).
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.