Opinion
June 16, 1997
Appeal from the Family Court, Richmond County (Clark J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.
The record supports the Family Court's conclusion that the appellant committed the family offense of harassment, thereby warranting the issuance of an order of protection against him ( see, Matter of Platsky v. Platsky, 237 A.D.2d 610; Matter of Cesaire v. Cesaire, 228 A.D.2d 592; Matter of Tibichrani v. Debs, 230 A.D.2d 746; Matter of Cutrone v. Cutrone, 225 A.D.2d 767; Matter of Pesce v. Pesce, 223 A.D.2d 647).
O'Brien, J.P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.