From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1534) CA 00-02569.

December 21, 2001.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Fahey, J. — CPLR art 78.)

PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE AND BURNS, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment in favor of petitioner entered October 16, 1998, respondents contend that petitioner abandoned the proceeding by failing to serve respondents with a copy of the judgment with notice of entry pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48. Contrary to respondents' contention, 22 NYCRR 202.48 "speaks to the period within which a proposed order or judgment reflecting the disposition of a motion or matter must be drawn by a party" ( Funk v. Barry, 89 N.Y.2d 364, 366) and does not apply to service of the judgment with notice of entry upon an opposing party. We have considered respondents' remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.


Summaries of

Cox v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Cox v. City of Niagara Falls

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF EMMETT COX, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS AND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 802

Citing Cases

Zavelin v. Greenberg

(Siegel, NY Prac. § 418 (4th ed.); see CPLR section 5513 [a]). As long as the judgment is properly entered,…