Submitted June 3, 1985
Decided July 9, 1985
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value ( see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 N.Y. 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Sean X., 63 N.Y.2d 943).
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of MICHAEL CALANDRA et al., Appellants…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jul 9, 1985
But obviously seeking to bolster her argument, defendant's counsel notes that "[t]he Court of Appeals…
Rypma v. StehrSee Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 409 U.S. 363, 365, 93 S.Ct. 647, 650, 34 L.Ed.2d 577…