From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bri-Mar Corp. v. Town Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 12, 1989
545 N.E.2d 624 (N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

Decided September 12, 1989

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Edward S. Conway, J.

Susan S. Dautel and Lloyd Sokolow, Town Attorney, for appellant.

Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., and Harriet B. Oliver for Bri-Mar Corporation and others, respondents.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (O. Peter Sherwood, Peter H. Schiff and Joan Leary Matthews of counsel), for New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the article 78 proceeding dismissed and judgment granted in favor of the Town Board of the Town of Knox declaring section 10 of the Sanitary Code of the Town of Knox valid.

The Legislature has clearly provided that "Local laws, ordinances or regulations which comply with at least the minimum applicable standards set forth in the sanitary code shall be deemed not inconsistent with such code" (Public Health Law § 228). Thus, Town of Knox Sanitary Code § 10, which provides more stringent standards than State regulations with respect to sewage or effluent disposal on the ground surface, is not impermissibly inconsistent with State regulations (see, Monroe-Livingston Sanitary Landfill v Town of Caledonia, 51 N.Y.2d 679, 683; Public Health Law § 228). We find no merit to the State Department of Environmental Conservation's argument that the regulation of such sewage and effluent disposal has been "impliedly pre-empted" by the State pollutant discharge elimination system (SPDES) permit regulation (see, ECL 17-0701 et seq.). SPDES regulation is not "so broad in scope or so detailed as to require a determination that [article 17] has superseded all existing and future local regulation" (Jancyn Mfg. Corp. v County of Suffolk, 71 N.Y.2d 91, 99).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Bri-Mar Corp. v. Town Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 12, 1989
545 N.E.2d 624 (N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Bri-Mar Corp. v. Town Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BRI-MAR CORPORATION, Doing Business as KNOX ESTATES…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 12, 1989

Citations

545 N.E.2d 624 (N.Y. 1989)
545 N.E.2d 624
546 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Opn. No. 96-41

Public Health Law § 228(2). Local laws, ordinances and regulations that comply with at least the minimum…

Pius v. Suffolk County Department of Health Services

The petitioners' challenge to the respondent's authority to promulgate and enforce the regulations contained…