From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Beer Garden v. N.Y. St. Liq. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 19, 1991
176 A.D.2d 171 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 19, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Peter Tom, J.].


The ALJ's finding, adopted by respondent, that petitioner allowed a minor to purchase an alcoholic beverage on August 21, 1987, is supported by substantial evidence, and this finding may not be disturbed by this Court. (M.D.M. Tavern Corp. v. New York State Liq. Auth., 157 A.D.2d 559.) Additionally, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. (Supra.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Beer Garden v. N.Y. St. Liq. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 19, 1991
176 A.D.2d 171 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Beer Garden v. N.Y. St. Liq. Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BEER GARDEN, INC., Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 171 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 192

Citing Cases

Yampolsky v Tsaryuk

Considering the first prong, establishing a likelihood of success on the merits, the plaintiff must prima…

Weber v. Barnett

Thus, while it is true that, a preliminary injunction may be granted where some, facts are in. dispute and.…