From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Capital Transit Company

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 10, 1954
216 F.2d 636 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 12110.

Argued October 27, 1954.

Decided November 10, 1954.

Mr. Kent D. Thorup, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Messrs. Joseph F. Castiello, William T. Hannon, Ralph F. Berlow and Joseph B. Calandriello, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Frank F. Roberson, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. John P. Arness, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PRETTYMAN and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.


The question is whether the Transit Company is liable in damages for injuries sustained by a passenger who fell in alighting from a bus which had stopped thirty inches from the curb, where there was no unusual hazard in the street but where there was an incline toward the curb for drainage purposes, substantially similar to the slope of street surfaces throughout the District.

The District Court correctly answered the question in the negative. Kieffer v. Capital Transit Co., 1954, 94 U.S.App. D.C. ___, 214 F.2d 241; Hoffman v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., 1952, 369 Pa. 212, 85 A.2d 144; Greco v. Public Service Interstate Transp. Co., 1947, 135 N.J.L. 280, 51 A.2d 1; Meelhein v. Public Service Coordinated Transport Co., 1938, 121 N.J.L. 163, 1 A.2d 418.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Capital Transit Company

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 10, 1954
216 F.2d 636 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Marshall v. Capital Transit Company

Case Details

Full title:Mrs. Ethel Burns (Wiggins) MARSHALL, Appellant, v. CAPITAL TRANSIT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Nov 10, 1954

Citations

216 F.2d 636 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
95 U.S. App. D.C. 1

Citing Cases

Swank v. Capital Transit Company

PER CURIAM. The facts in this case are so similar to those which were present in Marshall v. Capital Transit…

Sullivan v. Yellow Cab Company

Where, as here, there is doubt that the distance between the cab and the curb was even a contributing factor…