From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kieffer v. Capital Transit Co.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 22, 1954
214 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 11769.

Argued April 9, 1954.

Decided April 22, 1954.

Mrs. Katherine M. Staley and Mr. James F. Sharkey, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. Harry L. Cohen, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. Paul R. Connolly, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Mr. George D. Horning, Jr., Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before CLARK, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.


In an action for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellee, in connection with a fall of appellant in alighting from one of appellee's buses, the District Court at the conclusion of appellant's case directed a verdict in favor of appellee because of insufficient evidence of negligence. We affirm. The cause of the fall was left in such uncertainty at the conclusion of appellant's case that to permit the jury to attribute the claimed injuries to the negligence of appellee would be too speculative to warrant submission of the issue to them.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kieffer v. Capital Transit Co.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Apr 22, 1954
214 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Kieffer v. Capital Transit Co.

Case Details

Full title:KIEFFER v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Apr 22, 1954

Citations

214 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
94 U.S. App. D.C. 95

Citing Cases

Reece v. Capital Transit Company

Judgments n.o.v. were therefore properly entered. Kieffer v. Capital Transit Co., 1954, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 95,…

Perrino v. D.C. Transit System, Inc.

We think it is clear that plaintiff in this case presented no evidence to support a verdict in her favor…