From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Macedonio v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1313 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-24

In the Matter of Carl MACEDONIO, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Carl Macedonio, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.


Carl Macedonio, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

During a random search of petitioner's cell, a number of items of contraband were found including, among other things, a heavy duty copper staple, a portion of a paperclip and 102 greeting cards that were marked for sale. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing contraband, soliciting goods without the superintendent's approval, engagingin an unauthorized exchange and possessing another inmate's crime information. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of all of the charges except for the last one. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Initially, respondents concede that the part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of soliciting goods without the superintendent's approval is not supported by substantial evidence and must be annulled. Based upon our review of the record, we agree. Inasmuch as petitioner has already served the penalty and a loss of good time was not imposed, the matter need not be remitted for a redetermination of the penalty ( see Matter of Jiminez v. Prack, 107 A.D.3d 1266, 1267, 966 N.Y.S.2d 918 [2013];Matter of Nieves v. Venettozzi, 102 A.D.3d 1027, 1027, 957 N.Y.S.2d 910 [2013],lv. denied21 N.Y.3d 852, 965 N.Y.S.2d 790, 988 N.E.2d 528 [2013] ).

That part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of possessing contraband and engaging in an unauthorized exchange is, however, supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and the hearing testimony ( see Matter of Brooks v. Unger, 110 A.D.3d 1122, 1122, 972 N.Y.S.2d 740 [2013];Matter of Berkoviz v. Lee, 102 A.D.3d 866, 867, 958 N.Y.S.2d 450 [2013] ). Moreover, we find no error in the Hearing Officer's denial of documentary evidence that was irrelevant to these charges ( see Matter of Barnes v. Prack, 87 A.D.3d 1251, 1252, 930 N.Y.S.2d 308 [2011];Matter of Pujals v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 767, 767, 928 N.Y.S.2d 867 [2011] ). Nor do we find anything in the record to indicate that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Fero v. Prack, 108 A.D.3d 1004, 1005, 968 N.Y.S.2d 918 [2013];Matter of White v. Fischer, 108 A.D.3d 891, 892, 968 N.Y.S.2d 737 [2013],lv. denied22 N.Y.3d 853, 976 N.Y.S.2d 448, 998 N.E.2d 1073 [2013] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of soliciting goods without the superintendent's approval; petition granted to that extent and respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed. PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, STEIN and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Macedonio v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1313 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Macedonio v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Carl MACEDONIO, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 24, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 1313 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
116 A.D.3d 1313
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2824

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Garner

Respondents initially concede, and we agree, that the finding of guilt with regard to the charge of…

Garcia v. Garner

Respondents initially concede, and we agree, that the finding of guilt with regard to the charge of…