From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindenberg v. Brodek

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 13, 1938
25 Cal.App.2d 675 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)

Opinion

Docket No. 11556.

April 13, 1938.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Thurmond Clarke, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

No appearance for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.


THE COURT.

Upon the hearing on order to show cause why the appeal herein should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

[1] In this case the court itself has served upon the appellant an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The clerk's and reporter's transcripts were filed July 28, 1937. Thereafter the parties entered into a stipulation taking the case off calendar, in the hope of making settlement. This court has waited sufficiently. There is no opposition, and the appeal is dismissed. ( In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [ 224 P. 452]; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387 [ 224 P. 452].)


Summaries of

Lindenberg v. Brodek

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 13, 1938
25 Cal.App.2d 675 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
Case details for

Lindenberg v. Brodek

Case Details

Full title:FRED LINDENBERG, Respondent, v. ADOLPH BRODEK, as Administrator, etc.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 13, 1938

Citations

25 Cal.App.2d 675 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
78 P.2d 466