From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Yahne

Supreme Court of California
Mar 13, 1924
193 Cal. 386 (Cal. 1924)

Opinion

Crim. No. 2656.

March 13, 1924.

PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure release from custody on a charge of violating Autobus Transportation Act (Stats. 1917, p. 330). Petitioner remanded.

The petitioner was held in custody on a charge of violating the Autobus Transportation Act (Stats. 1917, p. 330).

H.L. McAllister for Petitioner.

Carl I. Wheat and R.M.J. Armstrong for Respondent.


At the conclusion of the oral argument in the above-entitled matter the Chief Justice made the following statement:

The Chief Justice: The justices are all satisfied that the complaint upon which the petitioner is held, as shown by the return, states a public offense, and that the question of whether or not the petitioner was guilty or innocent of that offense is the question counsel is now presenting to the court in his effort to show that the petitioner was engaged in interstate commerce and that an attempted prohibition of that interstate commerce was a violation of the interstate commerce clause of the federal constitution. We do not believe the record before us presents that question, and hold that the remedy of the petitioner is to defend the case before the trial court.

The petition will be denied and the prisoner remanded for the reasons stated and the remarks of the court will be transcribed and made the written opinion of the court.

Petitioner remanded.


Summaries of

In re Application of Yahne

Supreme Court of California
Mar 13, 1924
193 Cal. 386 (Cal. 1924)
Case details for

In re Application of Yahne

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of MELVILLE C. YAHNE for a Writ of Habeas…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 13, 1924

Citations

193 Cal. 386 (Cal. 1924)
224 P. 452

Citing Cases

McKENZIE v. SANTA FE TRAIL STAGES

The motion is good and it is granted. ( In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [ 224 P. 452]; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387…

Lindenberg v. Brodek

There is no opposition, and the appeal is dismissed. ( In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [ 224 P. 452]; In re…