From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 1998
250 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 26, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.).


Although defendant waived its right to conduct physical examinations of plaintiffs by failing to arrange for such in accordance with the preliminary conference order, and again by failing to move to strike the case from the trial calendar within 20 days of plaintiffs filing of a note of issue, we decline to disturb the motion courts exercise of discretion, where plaintiffs misrepresented that physical examinations had been completed in their certificate of readiness, and the conducting of the requested physical examinations will not delay commencement of the trial ( see, Dominguez v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 168 A.D.2d 376).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Law v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 1998
250 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Law v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:RONALD LAW et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 26, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 704

Citing Cases

Glover v. New York City Transit Authority

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in…

Carrasquillo v. Netsloh

We find, however, that it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the motion court to have made any…