From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glover v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 22, 2000.

December 27, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the infant plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 18, 2000, which directed her to submit to a physical examination.

Mark J. Rayo, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Louis A. Badolato of counsel), for appellant.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the infant plaintiff to submit to a physical examination (see, Law v. City of New York, 250 A.D.2d 540; Fitzgerald v. Avidon, 222 A.D.2d 335; Dominguez v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 168 A.D.2d 376; Williams v. Long Is. Coll. Hosp., 147 A.D.2d 558).


Summaries of

Glover v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Glover v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:XIOMARA GLOVER, ETC., APPELLANT, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 921