Lalack v. Lampert

Full title: DAVID LEE LALACK, Petitioner, v. ROBERT LAMPERT, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 13, 2006

No. 04-CV-002-ST (D. Or. Mar. 13, 2006)

Opinion

No. 04-CV-002-ST.

March 13, 2006

Noel Grefenson P.C. Salem, OR, Attorney for Petitioner.

HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, DOUGLAS Y.S. PARK, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, Salem, OR, Attorneys for Respondent.

ORDER

ANNA BROWN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#38) on January 13, 2006, in which she recommended this Court deny the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#1). The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9^th Cir. 1983). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8^th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#38). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#1) and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.