From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuhlgert v. Mich. State Univ.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 23, 2016
886 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 154499. COA No. 332442.

11-23-2016

Sebastian KUHLGERT, Conservator of Elisabeth Ostendorf, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY and Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, Defendants, and United Educators, Intervening Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider: (1) whether the plaintiffs claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Disability Compensation Act (WDCA), see MCL 418.131(1) ; Sewell v. Clearing Machine Corp., 419 Mich. 56, 62, 347 N.W.2d 447 (1984) ; and if not, (2) whether the Court of Claims erred by denying United Educators' motion to intervene.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Kuhlgert v. Mich. State Univ.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 23, 2016
886 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Kuhlgert v. Mich. State Univ.

Case Details

Full title:Sebastian KUHLGERT, Conservator of Elisabeth Ostendorf…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Nov 23, 2016

Citations

886 N.W.2d 724 (Mich. 2016)

Citing Cases

Kuhlgert v. Mich. State Univ.

The Court of Appeals shall consider: (1) whether the plaintiff’s claims are barred by the exclusive remedy…