From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirtdoll v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas
Jun 21, 2007
284 Kan. 946 (Kan. 2007)

Summary

In Kirtdoll, an administrative hearing officer found Frank Kirtdoll in violation of two Topeka city ordinances and ordered him to abate a property nuisance within 30 days by removing some abandoned vehicles and other material from his premises.

Summary of this case from Barnes v. Bd. of County Commissioners of Cowley County

Opinion

No. 95,946.

June 21, 2007.

Appeal from the Unpublished.


Pettions For Review of Decisions of The Court of Appeals Denied.


Summaries of

Kirtdoll v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas
Jun 21, 2007
284 Kan. 946 (Kan. 2007)

In Kirtdoll, an administrative hearing officer found Frank Kirtdoll in violation of two Topeka city ordinances and ordered him to abate a property nuisance within 30 days by removing some abandoned vehicles and other material from his premises.

Summary of this case from Barnes v. Bd. of County Commissioners of Cowley County

in Kirtdoll v. City of Topeka, No. 95,946, 2007 WL 570293 (2007) (unpublished opinion), rev. denied 284 Kan. 946 (2007), and Dahl v. City of Shawnee, No. 92,144, 2006 WL 851232 (2006) (unpublished opinion).

Summary of this case from Barnes v. Bd. of County Commissioners of Cowley County
Case details for

Kirtdoll v. City of Topeka

Case Details

Full title:Kirtdoll v. City of Topeka

Court:Supreme Court of Kansas

Date published: Jun 21, 2007

Citations

284 Kan. 946 (Kan. 2007)

Citing Cases

Barnes v. Bd. of County Commissioners of Cowley County

But to support its defense, the County directs us to our Court of Appeals' decisions in Kirtdoll v. City of…