From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimmel v. Ground Round Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 2000
272 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted March 29, 2000.

May 15, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated May 25, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Arlene Zalayet, Mineola, N.Y. (Scott L. Gumpert of counsel), for appellant.

Agoglia, Fassberg, Holland Crowe, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Eileen L. Farrell of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff was injured when she slipped and fell on a patch of ice in the parking lot of a restaurant owned by the defendant Ground Round Inc. (hereinafter Ground Round). Ground Round met its initial burden of showing that it neither created the condition complained of, nor had actual or constructive knowledge thereof. The plaintiff failed to sustain her burden of demonstrating the existence of a triable issue of fact. The evidence she presented was too speculative to establish that the defect was in existence for a sufficient length of time before the accident to permit the employees of the Ground Round to discover and remedy it (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; Marasia v. Noyl Coram, Inc., 260 A.D.2d 607; Davis v. City of New York, 255 A.D.2d 356; Sellet v. United Artists Theaters, 251 A.D.2d 488). The Supreme Court therefore erred when it denied the defendant's motion.

The plaintiff's contentions are without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kimmel v. Ground Round Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 2000
272 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Kimmel v. Ground Round Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE KIMMEL, respondent, v. GROUND ROUND INC., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 336

Citing Cases

Walton v. Kenny

In opposition, the appellant failed to raise a triable issue of fact to demonstrate that the owner either…

Rodriguez v. Notre Dame Academy

Here, there was nothing in the record to indicate that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the…