From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kellman v. Kellman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 22, 1990
162 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 22, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from two orders of Supreme Court that denied her motion to vacate a default judgment of divorce in favor of plaintiff, and denied her motion for ancillary relief, including temporary maintenance, custody and continued health insurance coverage. The motions were properly denied. Defendant does not challenge the propriety of the default divorce, but contends that the separation agreement is unfair. Where, as here, the separation agreement is incorporated but not merged into the divorce judgment, vacatur of the divorce judgment has no effect on the enforceability of the agreement; the agreement survives as a separate and enforceable contract. Defendant is relegated to a plenary action to rescind or reform the agreement under principles of equity (see, e.g., Lambert v. Lambert, 142 A.D.2d 557, 558; Mastrogiacomo v. Mastrogiacomo, 133 A.D.2d 671; Culp v Culp, 117 A.D.2d 700, 701; see generally, Christian v. Christian, 42 N.Y.2d 63).

As a corollary, it was proper for the court to deny defendant's request for ancillary relief and to defer those requests to Family Court. That result is mandated by the judgment of divorce and the separation agreement.


Summaries of

Kellman v. Kellman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 22, 1990
162 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Kellman v. Kellman

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT M. KELLMAN, Respondent, v. KAYE L. KELLMAN, Appellant. (Appeal No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
559 N.Y.S.2d 49

Citing Cases

Bryant v. Carty

We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying that part of his motion seeking vacatur of the…

Vandamme v. Curran

We reject that contention. Where, as here, a "separation agreement is incorporated but not merged into the…