From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Lehigh Construction Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 1999
259 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 19, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J. — Dismiss Pleading.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for the wrongful death of Nabil M. Ibrahem resulting from a fire at the chemical plant where he was employed. The complaint alleges that defendant Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company (VASC) was responsible for the manufacture, design and/or installation of the automatic sprinkler system at the plant. After service of the summons and complaint on VASC at its principal place of business in Roseville, Minnesota, VASC advised plaintiff's attorney that it had no connection to the sprinkler system at the plant where plaintiff's decedent died. Plaintiff then served the summons and complaint on The Viking Corporation (Viking) at its principal place of business in Hastings, Michigan. In a letter accompanying the service of process, plaintiff's attorney advised Viking that it had been incorrectly named as VASC.

Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Viking to dismiss the complaint against it pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) and properly denied plaintiff's cross motion to amend the summons and complaint to name Viking as the correct defendant pursuant to CPLR 305 (c) and 2001. "This is not a case where a party is misnamed ( see, Medina v. City of New York, 167 A.D.2d 268; Ober v. Rye Town Hilton, 159 A.D.2d 16); rather it is a case where the plaintiff seeks to add or substitute a party defendant ( see, Reid v. Niagara Mach. Tool Co., 170 A.D.2d 662; Creative Cabinet Corp. v. Future Visions Computer Store, 140 A.D.2d 483; Polizzano v. Gotham Constr. Corp., 47 A.D.2d 48)" ( Ospina v. VIMM Corp., 203 A.D.2d 440, 440-441, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 802). Thus, plaintiff failed to obtain jurisdiction over Viking, and relief pursuant to CPLR 305 (c) and 2001 is not available ( see, Security Mut. Ins. Co. v. Black Decker Corp., 255 A.D.2d 771; Potamianos v. Convenient Food Mart, 197 A.D.2d 734, 735-736).

Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Callahan, JJ.


Summaries of

Jordan v. Lehigh Construction Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 1999
259 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Jordan v. Lehigh Construction Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GRACE JORDAN, Individually and as Limited Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 322

Citing Cases

Smith v. Garo Enterprises, Inc.

A plaintiff may not invoke CPLR 305 (c) to proceed against an entirely new defendant, who was not served,…

Martin v. Witkowski

Rather, the wrong person (Sr.) was sued and jurisdiction was not timely obtained over the right person (Jr.)…