From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 24, 2014
Case No. CV 13-2673 VAP (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-2673 VAP (MRW)

02-24-2014

ANDREW JONES, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATE: February 24, 2014

/s/_________

HON. VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 24, 2014
Case No. CV 13-2673 VAP (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Jones v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW JONES, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 24, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 13-2673 VAP (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2014)

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Johnson

This federal Court should defer to the California state courts' rulings on the sufficiency or insufficiency…

Cornish v. P.D. Brazleton

im that state trial court should have instructed the jury on voluntary manslaughter, the court stated, "The…