From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isett v. Frees

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Mar 23, 1938
25 Cal.App.2d 466 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)

Opinion

Docket No. 11778.

March 23, 1938.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Arthur Crum, Judge. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

No appearance for Appellant.

W.I. Gilbert for Respondents.


THE COURT.

Upon submission of the motion to dismiss, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

[1] This matter comes before the court on a motion to dismiss. The appellant has not appeared in the case; that is, there has been no transcript or brief filed within the time provided by law. The motion is good and it is granted. ( In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [ 224 P. 452]; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387 [ 224 P. 452].)


Summaries of

Isett v. Frees

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Mar 23, 1938
25 Cal.App.2d 466 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
Case details for

Isett v. Frees

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. ISETT, Appellant, v. BEN FREES et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Mar 23, 1938

Citations

25 Cal.App.2d 466 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
77 P.2d 873

Citing Cases

Levin v. Levin

Rule 5(a) of Rules on Appeal for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal requires that an appellant…

Upper Third Street Develop. Corp. v. Milwaukee

The majority rule in the United States is that, in the absence of bad faith or unreasonable delay upon the…