From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

INGENITO v. RIRI USA, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 12, 2011
11-CV-2569 (CBA) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

11-CV-2569 (CBA) (RLM).

September 12, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is the report and recommendation ("R R") of the Honorable Roanne L. Mann, U.S. Magistrate Judge. which is dated August 9, 2011. The R R recommends that the Court deny the plaintiff's motion to remand this removed action to New York State Supreme Court.

The time for objecting to the R R has passed. No party has objected. No party has requested additional time in which to object. The Court has reviewed the R R and, seeing no clear error, Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), adopts the R R as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, the motion to remand is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate docket entries # 7, 12, and 15.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

INGENITO v. RIRI USA, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 12, 2011
11-CV-2569 (CBA) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

INGENITO v. RIRI USA, INC.

Case Details

Full title:LOREDANA INGENITO, Plaintiff, v. RIRI USA, INC. and BENJAMIN HOWELL II…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

11-CV-2569 (CBA) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 12, 2011)

Citing Cases

Peterkin v. Fedex Freight, Inc.

(internal quotations omitted) (emphasis in original); Ingenito v. Riri USA, Inc., No. 11-CV-2569-CBA, 2011 WL…