From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Tony H

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 2006
28 A.D.3d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8344.

April 25, 2006.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara P. Schechter, J.), entered on or about January 3, 2005, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights and committed custody and guardianship of the child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, the termination of parental rights vacated, the matter remanded for a new dispositional hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Patricia W. Jellen, Eastchester, for appellant.

John R. Eyerman, New York, for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Waksberg of counsel), and Proskauer Rose LLP, New York (Nathaniel M. Glasser of counsel), Law Guardian.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.


Respondent permanently neglected her child. Although the agency repeatedly attempted to assist respondent in meeting goals for the return of the child, she resisted these efforts by failing to comply with drug testing and engaging in activities that ultimately led to her arrest on a drug-related charge. However, in light of the circumstances of this case, including the foster parent's decision not to adopt the child, the passage of about two years since the dispositional hearing, and respondent's significant progress toward rehabilitation, there should be a new dispositional hearing to reevaluate the best interests of the child ( see Matter of Danny Darrell V., 284 AD2d 247).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Tony H

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 2006
28 A.D.3d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Tony H

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TONY H., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3021
813 N.Y.S.2d 88

Citing Cases

Raheim v. Renee

thus freeing them for adoption, was in their best interests ( see Family Ct Act § 631; Matter of Jennifer…

In re April Ww.

As we have previously noted, nothing in Family Ct. Act § 1089(d)(2)(i) permits a court to impose two…