From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re for Gdn. Custody of Danny Darrell V

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 2001
284 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 26, 2001.

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjorie Fields, J.), entered on or about February 8, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights and committed custody and guardianship of the subject children to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for the purposes of adoption, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of vacating the dispositional determinations with respect to respondent mother as to Danny V. and Manuel V., and remanding these two matters for a new dispositional hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Marcia Egger and Mary Ellen Sweeney, for Guardianship and Custody of Danny Darrell V.

Dora M. Lassinger and Patricia W. Jellen, for respondents-appellants.

Barry Abbott, for petitioners-respondents.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin, Buckley, JJ.


Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about August 24, 1999, which denied respondent father's motion to vacate the dispositional orders entered against him upon his default on or about February 8, 1999, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of all the circumstances of this case, including the foster parents' decision not to adopt and the passage of more than a year since the dispositional hearing, we conclude that there should be a new dispositional hearing to reevaluate the best interests of Danny and Manuel (see, Matter of Jelissa Ninette O., 233 A.D.2d 874). We see no reason to disturb the dispositional determination as to Noel, whose best interests are served thereby.

Respondent father's motion to vacate the dispositional orders entered against him upon his default was properly denied in light of his failure to present a reasonable excuse for his failure to attend the proceedings and his failure to offer a meritorious defense to the petition (see,Matter of Derrick T., 261 A.D.2d 108; Matter of Tyrone W., 223 A.D.2d 367).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re for Gdn. Custody of Danny Darrell V

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 2001
284 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In re for Gdn. Custody of Danny Darrell V

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION FOR GUARDIANSHIP AND CUSTODY OF DANNY DARRELL V., ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 562

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Tony H

Although the agency repeatedly attempted to assist respondent in meeting goals for the return of the child,…

In the Matter of Antonette E

The appellant and the Law Guardian argue that a suspended judgment should be granted. However, because a year…