From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Qureshi v. Roberto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2006
28 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2006-00745.

April 11, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, in effect, to grant her motion for leave to prosecute an action entitled Qureshi v. Fairhaven Apartments No. 4, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under index No. 3039/05, as a poor person. Application by the petitioner to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person.

Naila Qureshi, Purchase, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Miller, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application to prosecute this proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Qureshi v. Roberto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2006
28 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Qureshi v. Roberto

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NAILA QURESHI, Petitioner, v. ROBERT ROBERTO, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2764
812 N.Y.S.2d 363

Citing Cases

Robins v. N.Y.C. Office of Chief Med. Exam'r

Petitioner is not entitled to a judgment requiring OCME to amend its records or the final certificate of…