From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jason Sherman v. Lavalley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-23

In the Matter of Jason SHERMAN, Petitioner,v.Thomas LaVALLEY, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.


Jason Sherman, Ossining, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination, following a tier II disciplinary hearing, finding him guilty of harassment, misuse of state property and refusing a direct order. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and the mandatory surcharge has been credited back to his inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Valdez v. Fischer, 85 A.D.3d 1264, 1265, 923 N.Y.S.2d 920 [2011]; Matter of Rogers v. Fischer, 81 A.D.3d 1025, 1025, 916 N.Y.S.2d 845 [2011] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, J.P., SPAIN, LAHTINEN, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jason Sherman v. Lavalley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jason Sherman v. Lavalley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jason SHERMAN, Petitioner,v.Thomas LaVALLEY, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8519
932 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

Murray v. Fischer

The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination…

Hamilton v. Bezio

With respect to petitioner's request that he be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the tier III…