From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Derek Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 510267.

February 3, 2011.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Derek Rogers, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany, (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Harrison v Bezio, 77 AD3d 1000; Matter of Brown v. Fischer, 77 AD3d 1004, 1005). In reaching this conclusion, we note that petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination ( see Matter of Arroyo v Fischer, 77 AD3d 1002, 1003; Matter of Mercer v. Artus, 70 AD3d 1073, 1073).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Derek Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Derek Rogers

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEREK ROGERS, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 606
916 N.Y.S.2d 845

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Jason Sherman v. Lavalley

The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

In re Valdez

To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the tier III hearing, we…