From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Matteis v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 30, 2005
19 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

96913.

June 30, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Nicholas De Matteis, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating facility package procedures and the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting smuggling after an unauthorized powdered dietary supplement, along with the directions for its use, were discovered disguised as Kool-Aid in a package sent to petitioner by his cousin. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report and the letter from his cousin outlining the directions for the use of the supplement, combined with his admission at the hearing that he had spoken to his cousin about the supplement and had requested the directions for its use, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt ( see Matter of Sartori v. Selsky, 297 AD2d 839, 839-840; Matter of Nunez v. Selsky, 276 AD2d 962, 962). Petitioner's assertion that he requested the directions but not the supplement raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Herrera-Martinez v. Selsky, 294 AD2d 633, 634; Matter of Nunez v. Selsky, supra at 962). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including the claim that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been considered and are rejected.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

De Matteis v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 30, 2005
19 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

De Matteis v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICHOLAS DE MATTEIS, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 642

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Raqiyb v. Goord

We confirm. The misbehavior report and petitioner's admission that he hid a note in his underwear while…

IN RE DE MATTEIS v. SELSKY

Decided November 22, 2005. Appeal from 3d Dept: 19 AD3d 958. Motion for leave to appeal…