From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera-Martinez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 2002
294 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90532

May 2, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Francisco Herrera-Martinez, Marcy, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Rose and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was the subject of a misbehavior report which charged him with smuggling and conspiring to introduce narcotics into the correctional facility. At petitioner's disciplinary hearing, an investigator from the Inspector General's office testified that he had been investigating a woman known as Candy, who was suspected of transferring narcotics to inmates. As part of the investigation, he had monitored telephone calls made to Candy by petitioner during which he instructed her to obtain heroin and transfer it to another woman who would bring it into the facility. After her arrest, Candy admitted that she had received several calls from petitioner giving her instructions relating to the purchase and transfer of narcotics.

Petitioner was ultimately found guilty of both smuggling and conspiracy to introduce narcotics into the facility, a determination that was based upon substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and the testimony of the investigator who authored it (see, Matter of Tumminia v. Senkowski, 290 A.D.2d 902; Matter of Carota v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 676, 677, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 603). Petitioner's testimony, in which he admitted telephoning Candy but denied that the conversations were drug-related, presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Lyde v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 615, 616). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Herrera-Martinez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 2, 2002
294 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Herrera-Martinez v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF FRANCISCO HERRERA-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 2, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 889

Citing Cases

Sartori v. Selsky

cial events) were not apportioned between the two charges of misconduct of which petitioner was found guilty.…

Lopez v. Goord

She was told to call the telephone number of the mother of an inmate housed in petitioner's dormitory who was…