From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Brandon S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-02378

Submitted April 24, 2003.

May 19, 2003.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), entered February 14, 2002, which, upon a fact-finding determination, dated January 3, 2002, that upon the admission of Brandon S. that he violated the conditions of a term of probation imposed by an order of disposition of the same court dated January 30, 2001, adjudicating him to be a person in need of supervision, vacated the term of probation and committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year.

Carol Kahn, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Ian G. MacDonald, County Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Christian R. Cullen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from so much of the order of disposition as committed the appellant to the care and custody of the Dutchess County Commissioner of Social Services for one year must be dismissed as academic because the placement period has expired (see Matter of Neftaly R., 283 A.D.2d 579, 580).

The appellant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that his allocution was defective since he did not move to withdraw his admission on the grounds now asserted (see Family Ct Act § 321.4; CPL 220.60; People v. Crowell, 273 A.D.2d 321; People v. McCoy, 270 A.D.2d 432; cf. Matter of Anthony S., 302 A.D.2d 531 [2d Dept, Feb. 18, 2003]). We decline to review the appellant's contention in the interest of justice.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Brandon S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Brandon S

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF BRANDON S. (ANONYMOUS), appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 370

Citing Cases

In re Mtr. Nicholas

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition dated October 28, 2005 is affirmed insofar as…

MATTER OF JOSEPH G.

The court may also adjourn the proceedings in contemplation of dismissal prior to the entry of an order of…