From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McCoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 2000
270 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 9, 2000

March 23, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered February 10, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Martin Geoffrey Goldberg, Franklin Square, N.Y., for appellant.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Margaret Mainusch of counsel; Nell A. Mallen on the brief), for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's present claim that his plea should be vacated because of a defective allocution was not preserved by a timely motion pursuant to CPL 220.60 to withdraw his plea on the ground now asserted (see, People v. Johnson, 82 N.Y.2d 683 ; People v. Mackey, 77 N.Y.2d 846 ).

To the extent that the defendant challenges an order denying him relief pursuant to CPL 440.10, his failure to obtain leave to appeal from that order forecloses review of the order (see, CPL 450.15).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

BRACKEN, J.P., JOY, GOLDSTEIN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McCoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 2000
270 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. ALSHAMEEK McCOY, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
705 N.Y.S.2d 269

Citing Cases

People v. Timberlake

The defendant's remaining contention, that the Supreme Court should have granted his motions to vacate the…

People v. Timberlake

The defendant's remaining contention, that the Supreme Court should have granted his motions to vacate the…