From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Amaker v. David Carpenter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 6, 2006
28 A.D.3d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98322.

April 6, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Anthony D. Amaker, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Petitioner refused a correction officer's directive to leave his cell for a mental health call out. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with a facility movement violation and refusing a direct order. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier II disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with petitioner's testimony in which he admitted that he refused the officer's directive to leave his cell, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Guerin v. Miller, 16 AD3d 799). Regardless of whether petitioner knew of the mandatory nature of the mental health call out, he failed to comply with an order and, in doing so, committed a movement violation. We have considered petitioner's remaining claims, to the extent they are properly before us, and find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Amaker v. David Carpenter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 6, 2006
28 A.D.3d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Amaker v. David Carpenter

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY D. AMAKER, Petitioner, v. DAVID CARPENTER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 6, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2593
811 N.Y.S.2d 821

Citing Cases

In re Johnson v. Goord

We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with petitioner's admission that he struck and bit correction…

Amaker v. Selsky

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with petitioner's admission that he did not comply with the…