From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Johnson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 26, 2006
33 A.D.3d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 98821.

October 26, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner refused to return to his cell while being escorted from the first aid corridor and struck a correction officer with a closed fist. Other officers responded and assisted in placing petitioner in mechanical restraints. During the struggle, petitioner bit one of the correction officers on the wrist. As a result, two misbehavior reports were filed against petitioner, one charging him with refusing a direct order, assaulting staff, disturbing the order of the facility and violating facility movement regulations and a second charging him with assaulting staff. He was found guilty of all charges at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with petitioner's admission that he struck and bit correction officers while they were attempting to subdue him, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Amaker v Carpenter, 28 AD3d 828, 829; Matter of Lebron v McGinnis, 26 AD3d 658, 658, lv denied 7 NY3d 704). Petitioner's claim that he was acting in self-defense presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Carter v Goord, 8 AD3d 771, 772; Matter of Bingham v Goord, 302 AD2d 837, 838). Moreover, inasmuch as petitioner told the Hearing Officer that he did not wish to call any witnesses at the hearing, there is no merit to his claim that he was improperly denied the right to call witnesses ( see People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 142; Matter of Morales v Selsky, 1 AD3d 848, 849, lv denied 1 NY3d 510).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Johnson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 26, 2006
33 A.D.3d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In re Johnson v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LARRY JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 26, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7667
822 N.Y.S.2d 822

Citing Cases

Griffin v. Goord

Petitioner's procedural objections are unpersuasive. The record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted…

Ermmarino v. State

The Hearing Officer was in a position to remedy any perceived defect in petitioner's prehearing assistance…