From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re William McKinley Lodge No. 840, F. A.M.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 1933
4 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

July 28, 1933.

Leo J. Margolin, of New York City (Michael Feiring, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioning creditors.

Joseph Henry Essner, of New York City for intervening creditor and objector.

Murray L. Jacobs, of New York City, for creditors and bondholders.

Harry Geist, of New York City, for bankrupt.

Harold E. Lippincott, of New York City, for receiver.



In Bankruptcy. Motion to confirm report of special master upon the issues raised by the petition in bankruptcy and the answer of an intervening creditor. The only question argued was whether the bankrupt, an unincorporated company, was in business, so as to be included among the possible involuntary bankrupts. I am convinced that it conducted a regular course of transactions for the purpose of making a profit out of them and that these transactions were on a sufficiently large scale and sufficiently numerous to make the bankrupt a business company. These transactions were of far more economic importance to the alleged bankrupt than the purely fraternal transactions which were more closely connected with the primary object of the association. The fact that such profit as the lodge might make from the business transactions was not intended to be divided among the members did not prevent the lodge from being a business association.

Report of the special master is, therefore, confirmed. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

In re William McKinley Lodge No. 840, F. A.M.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 1933
4 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

In re William McKinley Lodge No. 840, F. A.M.

Case Details

Full title:In re WILLIAM McKINLEY LODGE NO. 840, F. A.M

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 28, 1933

Citations

4 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1933)

Citing Cases

Matter of Battles

A Federal court in construing the Benevolent Orders Law, for the purpose of determining whether a fraternal…

In re South Shore Co-operative Ass'n

In the opinion it is said that: "Where the chief purpose of the corporation is to carry on trade or commerce…