From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rizza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 19, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 506980.

November 19, 2009.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 20, 2008, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Ralph G. Rizza, Lake Grove, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Mary Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose, Kane and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Claimant worked as a cook at a nursing home for a little over two years. Following an argument with the head chef, claimant resigned from his position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.

It is well settled that harsh criticism from a supervisor ( see Matter of Orrijola [Commissioner of Labor], 55 AD3d 1201, 1202; Matter of Poliseno [Commissioner of Labor], 37 AD3d 938, 938) or the inability to get along because of a personality conflict ( see Matter of Hill [Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 1123, 1124; Matter of Crandall-Mars [Commissioner of Labor], 47 AD3d 1179, 1179) does not constitute good cause for leaving employment. In the case at hand, evidence was presented that claimant and the head chef had ongoing disagreements of which the employer was aware. During the incident in question, the head chef was instructing claimant on the proper manner of calculating the food portions when the conversation deteriorated into an exchange of personal insults ending in claimant's abrupt departure from the work-place. Although claimant stated that he experienced headaches and chest pains and was fearful that the head chef might become violent, he did not seek medical attention or advise the employer that he was afraid for his safety. Substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant left his job due to personal and noncompelling reasons.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Rizza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 19, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Rizza

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RALPH G. RIZZA, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 1239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8554
889 N.Y.S.2d 123

Citing Cases

In re Campise

"It is well settled that dissatisfaction with wages does not constitute good cause for leaving employment for…

Harrington v. Durett Bus. Mgmt. Corp.

We affirm. Criticism of one's work performance by a supervisor, even if unduly harsh, has been held not to…