From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Natoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 2010
71 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 2008-09403, 2008-09404, (Docket Nos. F-13351-07, F-14004-07).

March 16, 2010.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Livrieri, S.M.), dated February 4, 2008, which, after a hearing, inter alia, dismissed his petition to compel the mother to provide support and (2) an order of the same court (Budd, J.), dated September 8, 2008, which denied his objections to the order dated February 4, 2008.

Anna Martin, East Moriches, N.Y., for appellant.

Trump Boutcher, LLP, East Setauket, N.Y. (Robert F. Boutcher of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 4, 2008, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order dated September 8, 2008; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 8, 2008, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is fundamental public policy in New York that parents of minor children are responsible for their children's support until age 21 ( see Family Ct Act § 413; Matter of Roe v Doe, 29 NY2d 188, 192-193). Emancipation of the child suspends the parent's support obligation ( see Matter of Roe v Doe, 29 NY2d 188, 192-193). "[C]hildren . . . may be deemed constructively emancipated if, without cause, they withdraw from parental supervision and control" ( Matter of Lowe v Lowe, 67 AD3d 682, 683). Thus, "children of employable age and in full possession of their faculties who voluntarily and without cause abandon their home, against the will of their parents and for the purpose of avoiding parental control, forfeit their right to demand support even if they are not financially self-sufficient" ( Matter of Cricenti v Cricenti, 64 AD3d 776, 777; see Matter of Guevara v Ubillus, 47 AD3d 715). The evidence sufficiently supports the finding that the subject child was constructively emancipated.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

In re Natoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 2010
71 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Natoli

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS A. NATOLI, Appellant, v. JEAN MUELLER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2153
895 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

Monti v. DiBedendetto

The Support Magistrate properly determined that the child was no longer emancipated. "It is fundamental…

D.A. v. N.A.

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department has provided guidance as to the…