From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 2010
70 A.D.3d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2008-10246.

February 9, 2010.

In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 1412 (3)(a) for an order authorizing David J. Baron, as preliminary executor of the estate of Hattie G. Martin, to sell shares in a co-operative apartment to satisfy the debts and the ongoing administration expenses of the estate, Miladin Dobric appeals from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated October 29, 2008, which, upon a decision of the same court dated October 6, 2008, made after a nonjury trial, authorized the sale.

Miladin Dobric, Forest Hills, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Baron Baron, Forest Hills, N.Y. (David J. Baron, pro se, of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant has failed to comply with the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 20, 2009, requiring him to file the exhibits marked and received into evidence by the Surrogate's Court, Queens County. As the appendix filed by the appellant is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, the appeal must be dismissed ( see Cross Westchester Dev. Corp. v Sleepy Hollow Motor Ct., 222 AD2d 644).


Summaries of

In re Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 2010
70 A.D.3d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Martin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of HATTIE G. MARTIN, Deceased. MILADIN DOBRIC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 9, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 965
892 N.Y.S.2d 900

Citing Cases

Craig Miller v. Cruise Fantasies

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with costs. Since the appendix filed by the appellant is inadequate…

Augustus Butera Photography, Inc. v. Mca Creative Servs., Inc.

This is not sufficient for the court to render an informed decision. See Miller v Cruise Fantasies, Ltd., 74…