From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig Miller v. Cruise Fantasies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 2010
74 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 2009-01625, 2009-01626.

June 8, 2010.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated January 29, 2009, which granted the defendants' motion to confirm an arbitration award dated November 8, 2008, and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), and denied his cross motion to vacate the arbitration award, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated January 29, 2009, which, upon the order, is in favor of the defendants and against him in the principal sum of $8,967.23.

Craig Miller, White Plains, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Wilson Jacobson, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (Roni L. Jacobson of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Belen and Lott, JJ.


Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with costs.

Since the appendix filed by the appellant is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, the appeals must be dismissed ( see Matter of Martin, 70 AD3d 830; Cross Westchester Dev. Corp. v Sleepy Hollow Motor Ct., 222 AD2d 644).


Summaries of

Craig Miller v. Cruise Fantasies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 8, 2010
74 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Craig Miller v. Cruise Fantasies

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG MILLER, Appellant, v. CRUISE FANTASIES, LTD., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

74 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4971
902 N.Y.S.2d 372

Citing Cases

Matter of Jack S. v. Roger S.

Antoine S.'s death renders academic the issues raised by Roger S., and his appeal, therefore, must be…

Martin v. Baron

The issues raised on the appeal from the order would have been brought up for review on the appeal from the…