From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disbarment of Oscar Bodin

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 30, 1933
249 N.W. 569 (Minn. 1933)

Opinion

No. 29,602.

June 30, 1933.

Attorney and client — disbarment — proceedings.

1. Under our rules in proceedings for disbarment, when personal service has been made upon accused and he defaults, an order of discipline will be entered upon the assumption that he is guilty as charged.

Same — same — failure to account.

2. An attorney at law is disbarred for failure to account for his client's funds and failing to answer letters in reference to such delinquency.

Proceeding for the disbarment of Oscar Bodin. Judgment of disbarment ordered.

Oscar G. Haugland and Philip M. Stone, for state board of law examiners.

There was no appearance made or brief filed on behalf of respondent in this court.



The state board of law examiners filed a petition and accusation in this court for the discipline of Oscar Bodin, an attorney of this state. The petition and accusation, together with an order of this court, directed the respondent to plead or file his answer to the accusations in the office of the clerk of this court within eight days after the service thereof upon him. Personal service was made upon him on May 12, 1933, and by the affidavit of one of the representatives of the state board of law examiners filed herein it is made to appear that the respondent is in default and has in no way appeared herein though he has been advised of the rule hereinbefore mentioned.

Under a rule adopted by this court on May 15, 1933, when counsel in such a proceeding as this defaults we will enter an order on the assumption that he is guilty as accused. 187 Minn. xxxiv, rule I.

Here the accusation is that respondent (1) failed to account for funds which he collected for a client; (2) ignored and failed to answer letters in reference thereto; (3) ignored letters from local ethics committee in relation to his said conduct; (4) ignored communications from the state board of law examiners requesting a statement and explanation as to his said delinquency. Respondent has wholly failed to meet these accusations, and, since he so stands before us in default, judgment will be forthwith entered disbarring the said Oscar Bodin from practicing law in the state of Minnesota.


Summaries of

In re Disbarment of Oscar Bodin

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 30, 1933
249 N.W. 569 (Minn. 1933)
Case details for

In re Disbarment of Oscar Bodin

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DISBARMENT OF OSCAR BODIN

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 30, 1933

Citations

249 N.W. 569 (Minn. 1933)
249 N.W. 569

Citing Cases

In re Disbarment of Andreas K. Stauning

Thereafter, by stipulation made and filed, defendant withdrew the answer and stipulated by his attorney that…

In re Application for Discipline of Rice

Proof of misconduct such as is contained in the charges here is sufficient to disqualify the accused attorney…