From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disbarment of Andreas K. Stauning

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 29, 1933
252 N.W. 84 (Minn. 1933)

Opinion

No. 29,722.

December 29, 1933.

Attorney and client — disbarment — proceedings — default of accused.

1. When the accused in a disbarment proceeding is in default for want of an answer, an order for discipline will be entered upon the assumption that he is guilty as charged in the accusation if the accusation states facts constituting misconduct.

Same — misconduct warranting disbarment.

2. The misconduct charged in the accusation here presented is such as to require disbarment.

Proceeding by the state board of law examiners for the disbarment of Andreas K. Stauning. After respondent had appeared and filed an unverified answer, he withdrew his answer and stipulated that the matter be submitted to this court as upon default. Judgment of disbarment ordered.

Oscar G. Haugland, for state board of law examiners.

Oscar Hallam, for respondent.



This is an accusation in this court by the board of law examiners for the discipline of Andreas K. Stauning, an attorney of this state, defendant. The accusation and order to appear and answer were duly served. Defendant appeared and filed an unverified answer. Thereafter, by stipulation made and filed, defendant withdrew the answer and stipulated by his attorney that the matter be submitted to this court as if no answer had been interposed and as upon default. Under the rule adopted by this court, we proceed to determine the accusation on the assumption that defendant is guilty as charged in the accusation. In re Disbarment of Bodin, 189 Minn. 396, 249 N.W. 569.

The accusation, briefly stated, is that in two guardianship matters, in one of which defendant was the guardian and in the other the attorney for the guardian, he misappropriated and failed to account for or repay to the guardian, ward, or estate substantial sums of money, the property of the ward in each case. Some of the acts charged occurred more than two years before the commencement of this proceeding, but other acts of misconduct were within the two years, and the defaults in each case continued and do now continue.

The misconduct charged is such as to require disbarment, and it is ordered that judgment be entered disbarring Andreas K. Stauning from practicing law in the state of Minnesota.


Summaries of

In re Disbarment of Andreas K. Stauning

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 29, 1933
252 N.W. 84 (Minn. 1933)
Case details for

In re Disbarment of Andreas K. Stauning

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DISBARMENT OF ANDREAS K. STAUNING

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 29, 1933

Citations

252 N.W. 84 (Minn. 1933)
252 N.W. 84

Citing Cases

In re App. for Dis., Willie L. Williams

When such professional irresponsibility is manifested by the mishandling of a client's financial affairs,…