From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Christopher A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 1, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 505459.

October 1, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered September 4, 2008, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3, for an extension of placement.

Cynthia Feathers, Saratoga Springs, for appellant.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Kane, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.


Respondent was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent and, by order entered December 14, 2007, was placed in the custody of the Clinton County Department of Social Services until August 31, 2008. Petitioner's subsequent application for an extension of placement was granted and respondent remained in placement until January 24, 2009, at which time he was released. Counsel now seeks to be relieved of her assignment upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Inasmuch as respondent's release from placement renders the instant appeal moot ( see Matter of Andrew MM., 24 AD3d 1116, 1116; Matter of Justin S., 24 AD3d 1304, 1304; Matter of Wayne C, 11 AD3d 775, 775), we need not address counsel's application to be relieved of her assignment ( see Matter of Senator NN., 21 AD3d 1187, 1188; Matter of Natasha E., 15 AD3d 788, 789).

Respondent's appeal from Family Court's fact-finding and dispositional orders was withdrawn in August 2008.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Christopher A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 1, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Christopher A.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 1066 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6748
885 N.Y.S.2d 443

Citing Cases

In re Chelsea

Contrary to the arguments of respondent Ernest M., the father, the ensuing consent order has rendered the.…