From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Andrew MM.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 2005
24 A.D.3d 1116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

94471.

December 29, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered September 9, 2003, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3, to adjudicate respondent a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the Clinton County Department of Social Services for a period of 12 months.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur.


Based on his admissions, respondent was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent. At the dispositional hearing, despite the recommendations of all interested parties that he be placed on probation, Family Court determined that respondent's best interests required placement in the custody of the Clinton County Department of Social Services for a period of 12 months. Respondent appeals.

This appeal is moot as the 12-month placement period expired in August 2004 ( see Matter of Joseph YY., 306 AD2d 584, 585; Matter of Mark J., 259 AD2d 40, 43).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Andrew MM.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 2005
24 A.D.3d 1116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In re Andrew MM.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDREW MM., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 29, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 1116 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
807 N.Y.S.2d 180

Citing Cases

In re June MM.

These admissions are sufficient to sustain Family Court's finding of neglect ( see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f]…

In re Kashayla

Upon this appeal, respondent's sole argument is that her placement in DSS custody was not the least…