From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Burleson

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 25, 2017
NO. 03-17-00548-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 25, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 03-17-00548-CV

08-25-2017

In re Samuel Jedediah Burleson


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the Williamson County Clerk has not effectuated the filing of his civil suit, process of service, or made copies of the case files available to him. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. We have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district or county judge within our district or to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; In re Kramer, No. 03-17-00259-CV, 2017 WL 1832499, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin May 4, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op). We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

/s/_________

David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland Filed: August 25, 2017


Summaries of

In re Burleson

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 25, 2017
NO. 03-17-00548-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 25, 2017)
Case details for

In re Burleson

Case Details

Full title:In re Samuel Jedediah Burleson

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Aug 25, 2017

Citations

NO. 03-17-00548-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 25, 2017)