From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Impastato v. De Girolamo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1983
95 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

June 27, 1983


In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, defendant Paul Citrin, M.D., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated February 22, 1982, which, inter alia, denied his cross motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint as to him for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with costs. Although Dr. Citrin's cross motion was denominated as one to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a]), it was made after joinder of issue and, therefore, was actually a motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 (see Connell v. Hayden, 83 A.D.2d 30, 32). There is a sufficient showing in the record to permit a jury to find that the treating physician was Dr. Citrin's employee. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur. [ 117 Misc.2d 786.]


Summaries of

Impastato v. De Girolamo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1983
95 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Impastato v. De Girolamo

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES IMPASTATO, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1983

Citations

95 A.D.2d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Shen Zhang v. Wen Wei Ho

With respect to the branch of the respective motions by defendants Wen Wei Ho and Gan Hui Qian, and East…

Roseman v. Goldberg

Vicarious liability for medical malpractice turns on principles of agency and control in fact (see, Hill v…