From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 8, 1993
630 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-02678.

October 8, 1993.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Diana M. Allen, Judge.


Hyder appeals from an order granting in part and denying in part his motion to compel the State Attorney's Office to provide access to public records. We treat Hyder's appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Roesch v. State, 596 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), review granted, 617 So.2d 320 (Fla. 1993).

We deny the petition because Hyder is not entitled to a copy of the State Attorney's files free of charge. See Roesch. However, as in Roesch, we certify the following question:

WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE METHOD OF DISCLOSURE OF PUBLIC RECORDS HELD BY THE STATE ATTORNEY OR CLERK OF THE COURT WHERE THE RECORDS ARE REQUESTED BY AN UNREPRESENTED PRISONER WHO SEEKS THE RECORDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF?

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hyder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 8, 1993
630 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Hyder v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEE HYDER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 8, 1993

Citations

630 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Hyder v. State

PER CURIAM. We review Hyder v. State, 630 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), in which the court certified a…