From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Hood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 5, 1989
535 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

holding that "[t]he trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven[-]year payment period"

Summary of this case from Wright v. Wright

Opinion

No. 88-838.

January 5, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, Robert B. McGregor, J.

Marcia K. Lippincott of Marcia K. Lippincott, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Donna L. Surratt-McIntosh and Kenneth W. McIntosh, Sanford, for appellee.


The final judgment of dissolution is affirmed except for the payment period for the award of attorney's fees. The trial court required the husband to pay $14,000 for the wife's attorney's fees as follows: $200 per month with no interest for the first two years; 12% interest thereafter, or until the husband sold or otherwise transferred certain lakefront property.

The trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven year payment period, especially in light of the husband's financial affidavit reflecting net assets of over $117,000 and a weekly income of over $1,100. Urbieta v. Urbieta, 469 So.2d 930 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Under these circumstances, we think that a payment period should not exceed two years, and that it should provide for interest at a reasonable rate from the date of dissolution. Accordingly, we reverse the payment period with directions to the trial court to determine a schedule for payment consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hood v. Hood

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 5, 1989
535 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

holding that "[t]he trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven[-]year payment period"

Summary of this case from Wright v. Wright

holding that "[t]he trial court abused its discretion in allowing the husband a seven[-]year payment period"

Summary of this case from Wright v. Wright

reversing the order giving the former husband a seven-year payment period

Summary of this case from J.A.L. v. R.M.A.
Case details for

Hood v. Hood

Case Details

Full title:NANCY H. HOOD, APPELLANT, v. LOUIE FRANKLIN HOOD, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 5, 1989

Citations

535 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Wright

" Balko v. Balko, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D795, D795 (Fla. 2d DCA March 23, 2007) (citing Canakaris v. Canakaris,…

Wright v. Wright

We conclude that the structure of the award of attorney's fees and costs to the former wife was manifestly…