From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinojosa v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Feb 9, 2022
No. 12-21-00210-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2022)

Opinion

12-21-00210-CR

02-09-2022

BENITO HINOJOSA, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


DO NOT PUBLISH

Appeal from the 3rd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct. No. CR21-0785-3)

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Benito Hinojosa, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal in trial court cause number CR-21-0785-3. The clerk's record has been filed and reflects that the trial court granted the State's motion to dismiss cause number CR-21-0785-3.

In criminal cases, an appellate court has jurisdiction only from a final judgment of conviction or where expressly granted by law. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law but whether appeal is authorized by law); see also Young v. State, No. 12-06-00189-CR, 2006 WL 1699585, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler June 21, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op. not designation for publication); McIntosh v. State, 110 S.W.3d 51, 52 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, no pet.). Because the underlying case has been dismissed, there is no conviction and sentence to challenge on appeal. And an order granting the State's motion to dismiss is not a separately appealable order. See Flores v. State, No. 01-20-00243-CR, 2020 WL 2988564, at *3 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] June 4, 2020, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (per curiam); see also Small v. State, No. 14-14-00653-CR, 2014 WL 4384685, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 4, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (per curiam). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.


Summaries of

Hinojosa v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Feb 9, 2022
No. 12-21-00210-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Hinojosa v. State

Case Details

Full title:BENITO HINOJOSA, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Feb 9, 2022

Citations

No. 12-21-00210-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 9, 2022)

Citing Cases

High v. State

Because the underlying cases have been dismissed, there is no conviction and sentence to challenge on appeal.…