From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 12, 2005
915 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

finding defendant's conviction for second-degree felony lewd or lascivious molestation did not meet the criteria for sexual predator designation under section 775.21

Summary of this case from Conley v. State

Opinion

No. 2D05-898.

October 12, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, Michael F. Andrews, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Thomas William Hickey was convicted of lewd or lascivious molestation and subsequently designated a sexual predator by the trial court under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2002). We reverse the trial court's order designating Hickey a sexual predator because Hickey does not meet any of the criteria for the sexual predator designation delineated in section 775.21(4). The State concedes the error.

Hickey was convicted of lewd or lascivious molestation at the second-degree-felony level pursuant to section 800.04(5)(c)(2), Florida Statutes (2002). A person convicted under section 800.04 must meet either of two criteria to be designated a sexual predator under section 775.21(4). The first criterion is that the offense must be a first-degree felony violation, or attempt thereof, of section 800.04. § 775.21(4)(a)(1)(a). Hickey does not satisfy this criterion because his offense was a second-degree felony. Alternatively, the offense must be any felony violation, or attempt thereof, of section 800.04 and the offender must previously have been convicted of or pleaded to a violation of a crime specified in section 775.21(4)(a)(1)(b). Hickey does not satisfy this second criterion either because he was not shown to have been previously convicted of any of the specified predicate offenses.

Because Hickey meets neither of the statutory criteria, we reverse the trial court's order designating him a sexual predator and remand with directions to vacate the order.

WHATLEY and CANADY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hickey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 12, 2005
915 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

finding defendant's conviction for second-degree felony lewd or lascivious molestation did not meet the criteria for sexual predator designation under section 775.21

Summary of this case from Conley v. State

In Hickey v. State, 915 So.2d 663, 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), this court held that in order to be designated a sexual predator under section 775.21(4), a person convicted under section 800.04 must meet either of two criteria.

Summary of this case from Castaneda v. State
Case details for

Hickey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas William HICKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 12, 2005

Citations

915 So. 2d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Pringle v. State

As to Mr. Pringle's designation as a sexual predator, the State concedes that the record is incomplete and…

Lester v. State

However, we reverse his designation as a sexual predator because he does not meet the criteria for such a…