From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heller v. Conlon

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford
May 30, 1997
1997 Ct. Sup. 5133 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997)

Opinion

No. CV94 0136818 S

May 30, 1997


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (#119)


The defendant's motion to dismiss (#119) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied. General Statutes § 52-599 "gives the plaintiff an absolute right to have the representative of a deceased defendant cited in within one year after the defendant's death. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted; emphasis added.)Worden v. Francis, 170 Conn. 186, 188, 365 A.2d 1205 (1976). Well within one year of defendant Leonard Conlon's death, the plaintiff filed a motion pursuant to General Statutes § 52-599 and Practice Book § 99 to cite in Jacquelyn Conlon, the executrix of the estate of Leonard Conlon, as a party defendant in this action. That motion was granted by the court, Karazin, J., on June 10, 1996. Therefore, the plaintiff's action survives decedent Conlon's death, and the court has subject matter jurisdiction in the present case.

D'ANDREA, J.


Summaries of

Heller v. Conlon

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford
May 30, 1997
1997 Ct. Sup. 5133 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997)
Case details for

Heller v. Conlon

Case Details

Full title:NORMA J. HELLER vs. LEONARD R. CONLON

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford

Date published: May 30, 1997

Citations

1997 Ct. Sup. 5133 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Martin

. . ." Worden v. Francis, 170 Conn. 186, 188, 365 A.2d 1205 (1976); Dorsey v. Honeyman, 141 Conn. 397, 400,…