From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansbrough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 1, 1988
530 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-20.

September 1, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Lawrence R. Kirkwood, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Margene A. Roper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), under which court costs were imposed in this case, was enacted subsequent to the defendant's commission of the offenses and therefore the application of the statute violates the ex post facto provision of the state and federal constitutions. See State v. Yost, 507 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 1987). The imposition of court costs pursuant to section 27.3455 is stricken. The defendant's judgment and sentences are otherwise

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hansbrough v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 1, 1988
530 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Hansbrough v. State

Case Details

Full title:KIRK ALLEN HANSBROUGH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 1, 1988

Citations

530 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Opinion No. 1991-053

See section 25. Because the bill would retroactively apply new fees, penalties or court costs to defendants…